Meta-analysis: antiviral treatment for hepatitis D. Triantos, C., Kalafateli, M., Nikolopoulou, V. and Burroughs, A. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, on line first Jan 2012
BackgroundThere is no satisfactory treatment for patients with hepatitis D (HDV).Aim.To evaluate treatment for HDV using meta-analysis.Methods.Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library and ISI Web of Knowledge searches using the textwords ‘Hepatitis D’, ‘therapy’, “interferon”, “peginterferon”, “pegylated interferon”, “lamivudine”, “pegifn”, “ifn” and “Hepatitis D”, and abstracts from major Gastroenterology/Liver meetings.
Endpoints: end of treatment biochemical (biochemical EOT) and virological response (virological EOT), end of follow-up virological response (EOFUP VR), histological improvement and intrahepatic HDAg clearance.Results.We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing Group A: interferon-A (IFNa) vs. no treatment (three RCTs, n ;= ;137 patients), Group B: low dose vs. high dose IFNa (two RCTs, n ;= ;60), Group C: IFNa ;+ ;lamivudine vs. IFNa (two RCTs, n ;= ;48) and Group D: pegylated IFNa (PEG-IFNa) vs. other medications (two RCTs, n ;= ;157). Group A. IFNa was better for biochemical EOT [OR, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.04–0.2)] and virological EOT [OR, 0.08 (95% CI, 0.03–0.2)], but not for EOFUP VR. Group B. High dose IFNa was better for biochemical EOT [OR, 0.24 (95% CI,0.08–0.73)] and virological EOT [OR, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.1–0.74)]. Group C. There was a trend favouring histological improvement [OR, 2.9 (95% CI, 0.6–13.4)]. Group D. PEG-IFNa was better for virological EOT [OR, 0.419 (95% CI, 0.18–0.974)], EOFUP VR [OR, 0.404 (95% CI, 0.189–0.866)] and improvement in necroinflammatory activity [OR, 0.308 (95% CI, 0.129–0.732)].Conclusions.Long-term suppression of HDV RNA by IFNa is not maintained despite an end of treatment response; adding lamivudine is not beneficial. PEG-IFNa is superior to other medications with respect to EOT and EOFUP. New RCTs should test combinations of PEG-IFNa and newest antivirals.